Control judicial – Derecho y Políticas de Libre Competencia en América Latina

12 agosto, 201912 agosto, 2019 Manuel Abarca

El sistema chileno de responsabilidad civil derivada de ilícitos anticompetitivos frente a la OCDE: ¿Separate Ways?

25 junio, 201925 junio, 2019 Paul Arenas Roman

“Calculando daños en casos de competencia: ¿inflando el pollo?”

17 abril, 201917 abril, 2019 lmarintobar

Kimberly Clark vs. SCPM/SGCAN: La saga continúa..(rá)

20 enero, 2018 Juan David Gutiérrez R.

Investigación periodística: En los últimos seis años, 600 compañías en América Latina fueron sancionadas por acuerdos colusorios

19 octubre, 201719 octubre, 2017 Juan David Gutiérrez R.

23 de Octubre 2017: XII Jornada de Libre Competencia UC (indemnización de perjuicios)

27 abril, 2016 Julian

Now at an UBER rocky antitrust court bench: a follow up on the UBER price-fixing case

22 enero, 201625 enero, 2016 SebastiánHerediaQuerro

El estándar de prueba en casos de cartelización: un update Patagónico

Indian Competition Law 24 enero, 2020
M.M. Sharma (Vaish Associates) has written on "Role of Courts in Enforcement of Competition Law in India" which was published simultaneously both in the Global Competition Litigation Review , ( 2019 Volume 12, Issue 2/ 2019) as well as in...
D Daniel Sokol
No Forum to Rule Them All: Comity and Conflict in Transnational FRAND Disputes October 31, 2019 | 94 Wash. L. Rev. 1085 24 enero, 2020
Eli Greenbaum surveys No Forum to Rule Them All: Comity and Conflict in Transnational FRAND Disputes. Abstract: Recent years have seen an explosion in FRAND litigation, in which parties commit to license intellectual property under “fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory” (FRAND)...
D Daniel Sokol
The Effect of Leniency Rule on Cartel Formation and Stability: Experiments with Open Communication 24 enero, 2020
Maximilian Andres, University of PotsdamLisa Bruttel, Humboldt University of Berlin, Jana Friedrichsen, German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin); Humboldt University of Berlin - Faculty of Economics explore The Effect of Leniency Rule on Cartel Formation and Stability: Experiments with...
D Daniel Sokol

¿Por qué el carlismo termina siendo una suerte de ideario regional confinado en el Norte de España? 25 enero, 2020
@thefromthetree … Acaso cupiera pensar que la población vasco navarra y el montañés catalán se hallan más dentro de la vida campesina que el resto de los españoles en general"… No hay inconveniente en admitir nuestro ruralismo metafísico, en el que pudiera haber cierta gradación, siendo vascos, navarros y catalanes presa más firme del espíritu de la tie […]
JESÚS ALFARO AGUILA-REAL
Imputación de pagos en el concurso: pagos a los trabajadores realizados por el FOGASA 23 enero, 2020
Es la Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo de 8 de enero de 2020 ECLI: ES:TS:2020:6De este modo, las reglas de imputación de pagos deben extraerse de los principios concursales y de la ratio subyacente a las reglas de preferencia de pagos dentro del concurso. Conforme a las mismas, los créditos contra la masa deben pagarse a su vencimiento ( art. 84.3 LC), mientra […]
JESÚS ALFARO AGUILA-REAL
Interpretación del art. 400 LEC: preclusión de la alegación de hechos y fundamentos jurídicos en una acción de responsabilidad de los administradores 23 enero, 2020
UnamunoEs la Sentencia de 8 de enero de 2020, ECLI: ES:TS:2020:11 La identidad objetiva se produce en este caso como consecuencia del reseñado efecto preclusivo del art. 400 LEC. En el primer pleito se ejercitó una acción de responsabilidad contra los administradores de Hicsa basada en el incumplimiento de los deberes de promover la disolución, estando la so […]
JESÚS ALFARO AGUILA-REAL

The Davies Forecast of Top 5 Trends and Issues for Canadian Competition Law in 2020 24 enero, 2020
The Davies Forecast of Top 5 Trends and Issues for Canadian Competition Law in 2020 Jim Dinning, Anita Banicevic and Mark Katz Here is Davies’ annual forecast of Canadian competition law developments for the year ahead. 1. FOCUS ON THE DIGITAL ECONOMY Given the Competition Bureau’s stated priorities during the tenure of current Commissioner of... Continue re […]
Mark Katz, http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/author/mark-katz/, Array
The Autorité de la concurrence and Bundeskartellamt report on “Algorithms and Competition” 24 enero, 2020
I. Introduction Algorithms may raise competition concerns especially when assessing collusive practices. Very often, the term “algorithm” is used improperly. When we imagine the cartels of the future, we are not talking, in fact, about a simple “algorithm”, which in itself is a neutral instrument. Rather, we refer to much more specific techniques for impleme […]
Alessandro Massolo, http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/author/alessandro-massolo/, Array
CICRA’s 150th merger decision 23 enero, 2020
CICRA stands for Channel Islands Competition and Regulatory Authorities. This is the competition authority for Jersey and Guernsey, small island jurisdictions located between France and England. CICRA comprises the Jersey CRA and the Guernsey CRA. Both jurisdictions have separate and different merger control legislation, including different merger thresholds […]
Rob van der Laan, http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/author/rob-van-der-laan/, Array

U.S. moves to modify, extend antitrust consent decree with Live Nation/Ticketmaster 22 diciembre, 2019
Consent decree reform has been a hallmark of the Makan Delrahim Antitrust Division. For two years, the head of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division has undertaken efforts to terminate legacy consent decrees and to streamline consent decree enforcement procedures. The agency has retired hundreds of legacy antitrust judgments. Currently, the agency is […]
Jeffrey May, http://antitrustconnect.com/author/jmay/, Array
Twelve Other Carmakers Move to Support Government Enforcement of Uniform Federal Standards on Emissions. – Will the DOJ Investigate? 7 noviembre, 2019
This article follows up on an October 15, 2019 article by the author on a reported investigation by the DOJ Antitrust Division into possible ‘collusion’ by four carmakers in entering into a framework agreement with the State of California on emissions standards. What the government antitrust enforcers choose not to pursue may be as revealing... Continue read […]
Richard Wolfram, http://antitrustconnect.com/author/richardwolfram/, Array
Supreme Court Review Sought for Per Se Rule in Criminal Cases 30 octubre, 2019
A petition for review is before the Supreme Court filed by three California real estate investors who were convicted after trial under Section 1 of the Sherman Act for bid rigging at real estate foreclosure auctions. The defendants preserved their objection that the application of the per se rule was unconstitutional because it took an... Continue reading T […]
Robert E. Connolly, http://antitrustconnect.com/author/roberteconnolly/, Array

Digital Marketing Enforcement Is Top Competition Bureau Enforcement Priority: New Remarks 24 enero, 2020
January 24, 2020 In an interesting speech on January 22, 2020 by the Deputy Commissioner of Competition, Deceptive Marketing Practices Directorate, the Competition Bureau (Bureau) outlined its current digital marketing enforcement priorities (see: Honest Advertising in the Digital Age). In general, the Deputy Commissioner’s remarks reflect an overall heighte […]
admin
Competition Bureau Investigates Novel Case Involving Political Parties’ Collection and Use of Personal Information 17 enero, 2020
January 17, 2020 In an interesting and rather novel case, the Competition Bureau (Bureau) is reportedly investigating whether three major Canadian political parties (the Liberal, Conservative and NDP parties) violated the Competition Act in relation to their collection and use of Canadians’ personal information. According to media reports (see here, here, he […]
admin
Influencer Advertising: Competition Act Compliance Now a Material Concern For Brands and Agencies 12 enero, 2020
January 12, 2020 Over the past several years, competition enforcement agencies have been increasing their scrutiny of false and misleading influencer marketing. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initially led the charge in terms of guidance and enforcement, which included its Endorsement Guides, Endorsement Guides FAQs and warning letters to brands an […]
admin

El resarcimiento de daños causados en mercados no afectados por un cártel (STJUE de 12 de diciembre de 2019) 13 diciembre, 2019
La sentencia de 12 de diciembre de 2019 (aquí) del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (TJUE) resuelve una petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Tribunal Supremo de Austria en relación con un litigio sobre reclamación de indemnizaciones derivadas de un cártel prohibido por el artículo 101 TFUE realizado entre empresas del sector de los ascen […]
La doctrina jurisprudencial sobre el «hallazgo causal» y su supeditación a la idoneidad y proporcionalidad de la inspección (Sentencia Tribunal Supremo de 22 de octubre de 2019) 6 noviembre, 2019
Uno de los problemas habituales en la aplicación práctica del Derecho Antitrust por parte de autoridades de competencia y judiciales (europeas y españolas) es el de los límites de las actuaciones de inspección. La coexistencia de intereses muy diversos genera conflictos entre los derechos de inspección de la Administración y los de defensa de los afectados o […]
La Comisión (UE) publica sus «Passing-on Guidelines» (julio 2019) 9 julio, 2019
La Comisión (UE) ha publicado su última aportación para ayudar a la cuantificación del daño derivado de infracciones de competencia, esta vez en relación con el sobrecoste repercutido al comprador indirecto (su texto aquí), cumpliendo de esta forma con el artículo 16 de la Directiva 2014/104/UE (la conocida «Directiva de Daños»). Conviene recordar que el art […]

Comisión Europea v Google 28 agosto, 2015
Hace cuatro meses, la Comisión Europea le envió a Google [Diclaimer: este blog se aloja en un sitio de Google] su Statement of Objections (SO) en la que indicaba qué le objetaba a dicha firma (síntesis: buscador, android tal vez, otros que no recuerdo). La investigación comenzó en 2010, convengamos. En síntesis, se decía:"Google systematically positions […]
Francisco Agüero
i am back 28 agosto, 2015
El último post fue hace varios meses. Razones para escribir, abundan. Razones para no escribir, pueden ser mayores. Como sea: I am back.
Francisco Agüero
U. of Chicago Summer Institute Law and Economics: Economic Analysis of Contracts and Commercial Law 14 enero, 2015
Un interesante programa en Derecho & Economía imparte la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Chicago, en julio de este año. Me parece recomendable (disclaimer: postulé a él), y hay docentes del nivel de Eric Posner, Randal Picker, entre otros.Más información, acá: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/lawecon/summerinstitute P.D.. El deadline se ha extendido, […]
Francisco Agüero

Mobile payments, antitrust and socio-economic development 18 julio, 2018
Digital Markets, Mobile Payments Systems, and Development – Competition Policy Implications in Developing Countries in Light of the EU Experience “Abstract The digitization of economic activity has important socio-economic development implications and at the same time creates challenges for antitrust analysis. These implications and challenges have been met […]
DevelopingWorldAntitrust
A contribution to the empirics of algorithmic pricing 12 julio, 2018
An Empirical Analysis of Algorithmic Pricing on Amazon Marketplace “Abstract The rise of e-commerce has unlocked practical applications for algorithmic pricing (also called dynamic pricing algorithms), where sellers set prices using computer algorithms. Travel websites and large, well known e-retailers have already adopted algorithmic pricing strategies, but […]
DevelopingWorldAntitrust
What do computer scientists have to say about algorithmic collusion? 4 julio, 2018
The importance of talking to computer scientists before making assumptions about what pricing algorithms can do: Algorithms, Machine Learning, and Collusion “Abstract This paper discusses the question whether self-learning price-setting algorithms are able to coordinate their pricing behaviour to achieve a collusive outcome that maximizes the joint profits o […]
DevelopingWorldAntitrust

Recidivism: a Commission fining policy that might not be hitting the mark 5 julio, 2016
Kevin Coates
Defining a single and continuous infringement in cases with asymmetrical participation 31 mayo, 2016
Defining a set of conduct as a single and continuous infringement (SCI) has significant consequences for parties to a cartel, in particular for their exposure in follow-on damages actions. It is no surprise, therefore, that the increased prevalence of damages actions in Europe has led to greater scrutiny of the Commission’s findings about SCI. In […]
Kevin Coates
Something old and something new 30 mayo, 2016
As avid readers of social media, Politico, Chillin Competition and other places will know, I left the Commission at the end of February. On 4 April I joined Covington’s growing competition team in Brussels. I will continue to write on this blog – though experience has taught me to make no promises as to whether […]
Kevin Coates

	Retos del Derechos d… en Carteles y programas de delaci…
	JuanBRodríguezN en Call for papers sobre relación…
	La Declaración de Ut… en Hipster Antitrust: ¿Anarchy in…
	Artículo sobre las G… en La CNDC publica sus Guías para…
	Primer Congreso de D… en Retos de la competencia en los…
	Retos de la competen… en Plataformas digitales y Derech…

Derecho y Políticas de Libre Competencia en América Latina

Competencia y Regulación en América Latina | Antitrust and Regulation in Latin America | Concorrência e Regulamento na América Latina

Categoría: Control judicial

El sistema chileno de responsabilidad civil derivada de ilícitos anticompetitivos frente a la OCDE: ¿Separate Ways?

“Calculando daños en casos de competencia: ¿inflando el pollo?”

Kimberly Clark vs. SCPM/SGCAN: La saga continúa..(rá)

Investigación periodística: En los últimos seis años, 600 compañías en América Latina fueron sancionadas por acuerdos colusorios

23 de Octubre 2017: XII Jornada de Libre Competencia UC (indemnización de perjuicios)

Now at an UBER rocky antitrust court bench: a follow up on the UBER price-fixing case

El estándar de prueba en casos de cartelización: un update Patagónico

enero 2020
L	M	X	J	V	S	D
« Dic
		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31