Argentina – Desayuno antitrust sobre “Regulación y competencia”

El próximo desayuno será el martes 26 de abril a las 9hs. en La Cava de El Querandí (Perú 322, Ciudad de Buenos Aires). El tema de análisis será “La frontera entre regulación y competencia en la experiencia argentina” y abrirá el debate Agustín Siboldi.

Quienes deseen asistir por favor contactarse con Julián Peña (jp@allendebrea.com.ar).

Responder Cancelar respuesta

Introduce aquí tu comentario...

Por favor, inicia sesión con uno de estos métodos para publicar tu comentario:

Correo electrónico (necesario) (La dirección no se hará pública)

Nombre (necesario)

Web

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. ( Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google. ( Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. ( Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. ( Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Cancelar

Conectando a %s

Anti-Hipster Antitrust 5 diciembre, 2019
John Newman, Miami advocates Anti-Hipster Antitrust. ABSTRACT: Antitrust is undergoing a renaissance. New voices have emerged. Issues long considered settled have been opened for re-examination. Lively debate has prompted antitrust stakeholders to re-evaluate familiar concepts like “consumer welfare.” Some have...
D Daniel Sokol
How Concerned Should We Be About Algorithmic Tacit Collusion? Comments on Calvano et al. 5 diciembre, 2019
Ai Deng, NERA asks How Concerned Should We Be About Algorithmic Tacit Collusion? Comments on Calvano et al. ABSTRACT: A recent study by four economists (Calvano et al, 2019) has undoubtedly refueled the public and academic interest in algorithmic tacit...
D Daniel Sokol
Private Antitrust Enforcement in the US and the EU - A Comparison of Key Issues 5 diciembre, 2019
Thomas Obersteiner, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP offers Private Antitrust Enforcement in the US and the EU - A Comparison of Key Issues. ABSTRACT: This paper explains how the EU has adopted some elements from the US system of private...
D Daniel Sokol

Unas Conclusiones muy poco útiles para el Tribunal y para el juez nacional: Bobek sobre los acuerdos de fijación de tasas de intercambio 5 diciembre, 2019
“Si parece un pez y huele como un pez, se puede presumir que es un pez. A no ser que, a primera vista, se detecte algo extraño en este pez particular, como, por ejemplo, que no tenga aletas, que flote en el aire o que huela a lirios, no es preciso diseccionarlo con detalle para calificarlo como pez. En cambio, si el pez presenta algo fuera de lo normal, quiz […]
JESÚS ALFARO AGUILA-REAL
Nacionalismo metodológico 5 diciembre, 2019
Ilya Repin Russia 1844-1930Milanovic dice algo interesante en su libro Capitalism Alone (pp 158-159)La desigualdad mundial de oportunidades no se considera en general un problema, y mucho menos un problema que necesite una solución. Dentro de los Estados-nación, muchas personas consideran que la transmisión intergeneracional de la riqueza adquirida por la fa […]
JESÚS ALFARO AGUILA-REAL
Toys R Us, los fondos de private equity, el Derecho de Sociedades y el Derecho Concursal 2 diciembre, 2019
Puente viejo de OsorJonathan Ford cuenta en una columna del Financial Times la triste historia de Toys R Us. El fabricante y distribuidor de juguetes norteamericano ha quebrado y en el concurso se ha ordenado su liquidación a finales del año pasado. Toys R Us fue adquirido hace una década por un fondo de private equity, KKR. Como es sabido, un fondo de priva […]
JESÚS ALFARO AGUILA-REAL

The Curious Case of Composite Combinations under the Indian Competition Law Regime 5 diciembre, 2019
Introduction Sections 5 and 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 [‘the Act’] provide the basic statutory framework for merger control in India. The Report of the Raghavan Committee, which played an instrumental role in the formulation of the Act, contemplated the Indian Competition Law regime to be one of pre-notification in order to elude the... Continue reading […]
Urja Dhapre, http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/author/urja-dhapre/, Array
Competition law whistle-blowing to pay off in China? 3 diciembre, 2019
As the number of leniency applications is down globally and competition authorities are struggling to find alternative sources of supply for antitrust complaints, China has circulated a draft rule to financially incentivise employee whistle-blowing. On 19 November 2019, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) posted a draft of the Interim Measu […]
Adrian Emch, http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/author/adrian-emch/, Array
Digitalisation, online platforms and competition law: an overview of regulatory developments in the Netherlands (2019) 2 diciembre, 2019
Introduction In 2019 several studies have been published and discussions took place about digitalisation, online platforms and competition law. Many of us will probably have read the so-called Crémer, Furman, Stigler, and Lear-reports. The Netherlands did not lag behind. The Dutch government published amongst others a vision on data sharing between businesse […]
Tialda Beetstra, http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/author/tialda-beetstra/, Array

Twelve Other Carmakers Move to Support Government Enforcement of Uniform Federal Standards on Emissions. – Will the DOJ Investigate? 7 noviembre, 2019
This article follows up on an October 15, 2019 article by the author on a reported investigation by the DOJ Antitrust Division into possible ‘collusion’ by four carmakers in entering into a framework agreement with the State of California on emissions standards. What the government antitrust enforcers choose not to pursue may be as revealing... Continue read […]
Richard Wolfram, http://antitrustconnect.com/author/richardwolfram/, Array
Supreme Court Review Sought for Per Se Rule in Criminal Cases 30 octubre, 2019
A petition for review is before the Supreme Court filed by three California real estate investors who were convicted after trial under Section 1 of the Sherman Act for bid rigging at real estate foreclosure auctions. The defendants preserved their objection that the application of the per se rule was unconstitutional because it took an... Continue reading T […]
Robert E. Connolly, http://antitrustconnect.com/author/roberteconnolly/, Array
The DOJ Investigates Car Manufacturers for ‘Collusion’ in Their Framework Agreement with California on Gas Mileage and Emissions Standards: Sounding the Depths of Prosecutorial Discretion on Anticompetitive Collusion As Distinguished from Procompetitive Collaboration 15 octubre, 2019
At a historic moment in the country when political winds are doing flips, turning impossible corners and reaching even weather forecasting, it is imperative that law enforcement remain solidly grounded in fact and the law. An abiding hope, maybe now more than ever, and no less true for antitrust, especially given its economic and marketplace... Continue read […]
Richard Wolfram, http://antitrustconnect.com/author/richardwolfram/, Array

Should Advertising Regulators Enforce Wokeness?: Canadian Lawyer 10 septiembre, 2019
September 10, 2019 In my new Canadian Lawyer column, I take a look at two recent U.K. ASA advertising decisions with potential implications for Canada. Below is an excerpt with a link to my column. ******************* In an interesting development, two ads were recently banned under new gender stereotyping in advertising rules recently implemented by […]
admin
Canadian Competition Law Compliance Programs: Key Requirements 22 agosto, 2019
August 22, 2019 Practical Law Canada has published a New Legal Update, which discusses key requirements of competition law compliance programs in Canada, in light of the U.S. Department of Justice’s recent shift to align its approach to recognizing compliance programs with Canada. Below is an excerpt with a link to the full Legal Update […]
admin
Canadian Spam Law (CASL): Common Compliance Errors 18 agosto, 2019
August 18, 2019 Canada’s federal anti-spam legislation (CASL) came into force more than five years ago. Since then, marketers and their advisors have been working to comply with what remains a complex and difficult law with a number of outstanding uncertainties in key areas. In providing CASL advice to marketing clients since the law came into […]
admin

La doctrina jurisprudencial sobre el «hallazgo causal» y su supeditación a la idoneidad y proporcionalidad de la inspección (Sentencia Tribunal Supremo de 22 de octubre de 2019) 6 noviembre, 2019
Uno de los problemas habituales en la aplicación práctica del Derecho Antitrust por parte de autoridades de competencia y judiciales (europeas y españolas) es el de los límites de las actuaciones de inspección. La coexistencia de intereses muy diversos genera conflictos entre los derechos de inspección de la Administración y los de defensa de los afectados o […]
La Comisión (UE) publica sus «Passing-on Guidelines» (julio 2019) 9 julio, 2019
La Comisión (UE) ha publicado su última aportación para ayudar a la cuantificación del daño derivado de infracciones de competencia, esta vez en relación con el sobrecoste repercutido al comprador indirecto (su texto aquí), cumpliendo de esta forma con el artículo 16 de la Directiva 2014/104/UE (la conocida «Directiva de Daños»). Conviene recordar que el art […]
Doble sanción («doble barrera») y principio «non bis in idem» (STJUE de 3 de abril de 2019) 27 mayo, 2019
La Sentencia del TJUE de 3 de abril de 2019 (aquí) trata el interesante tema de la «aplicación doble» del Derecho Antitrust por parte de Autoridades Nacionales, como respuesta a una petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Tribunal Supremo de Polonia en un asunto relativo a un abuso de posición dominante. La posible imposición de una doble multa (un […]

Comisión Europea v Google 28 agosto, 2015
Hace cuatro meses, la Comisión Europea le envió a Google [Diclaimer: este blog se aloja en un sitio de Google] su Statement of Objections (SO) en la que indicaba qué le objetaba a dicha firma (síntesis: buscador, android tal vez, otros que no recuerdo). La investigación comenzó en 2010, convengamos. En síntesis, se decía:"Google systematically positions […]
Francisco Agüero
i am back 28 agosto, 2015
El último post fue hace varios meses. Razones para escribir, abundan. Razones para no escribir, pueden ser mayores. Como sea: I am back.
Francisco Agüero
U. of Chicago Summer Institute Law and Economics: Economic Analysis of Contracts and Commercial Law 14 enero, 2015
Un interesante programa en Derecho & Economía imparte la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Chicago, en julio de este año. Me parece recomendable (disclaimer: postulé a él), y hay docentes del nivel de Eric Posner, Randal Picker, entre otros.Más información, acá: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/lawecon/summerinstitute P.D.. El deadline se ha extendido, […]
Francisco Agüero

Mobile payments, antitrust and socio-economic development 18 julio, 2018
Digital Markets, Mobile Payments Systems, and Development – Competition Policy Implications in Developing Countries in Light of the EU Experience “Abstract The digitization of economic activity has important socio-economic development implications and at the same time creates challenges for antitrust analysis. These implications and challenges have been met […]
DevelopingWorldAntitrust
A contribution to the empirics of algorithmic pricing 12 julio, 2018
An Empirical Analysis of Algorithmic Pricing on Amazon Marketplace “Abstract The rise of e-commerce has unlocked practical applications for algorithmic pricing (also called dynamic pricing algorithms), where sellers set prices using computer algorithms. Travel websites and large, well known e-retailers have already adopted algorithmic pricing strategies, but […]
DevelopingWorldAntitrust
What do computer scientists have to say about algorithmic collusion? 4 julio, 2018
The importance of talking to computer scientists before making assumptions about what pricing algorithms can do: Algorithms, Machine Learning, and Collusion “Abstract This paper discusses the question whether self-learning price-setting algorithms are able to coordinate their pricing behaviour to achieve a collusive outcome that maximizes the joint profits o […]
DevelopingWorldAntitrust

Recidivism: a Commission fining policy that might not be hitting the mark 5 julio, 2016
Kevin Coates
Defining a single and continuous infringement in cases with asymmetrical participation 31 mayo, 2016
Defining a set of conduct as a single and continuous infringement (SCI) has significant consequences for parties to a cartel, in particular for their exposure in follow-on damages actions. It is no surprise, therefore, that the increased prevalence of damages actions in Europe has led to greater scrutiny of the Commission’s findings about SCI. In […]
Kevin Coates
Something old and something new 30 mayo, 2016
As avid readers of social media, Politico, Chillin Competition and other places will know, I left the Commission at the end of February. On 4 April I joined Covington’s growing competition team in Brussels. I will continue to write on this blog – though experience has taught me to make no promises as to whether […]
Kevin Coates

	JuanBRodríguezN en Call for papers sobre relación…
	La Declaración de Ut… en Hipster Antitrust: ¿Anarchy in…
	Artículo sobre las G… en La CNDC publica sus Guías para…
	Primer Congreso de D… en Retos de la competencia en los…
	Retos de la competen… en Plataformas digitales y Derech…
	Retos de la competen… en Now at an UBER rocky antitrust…

Derecho y Políticas de Libre Competencia en América Latina

Competencia y Regulación en América Latina | Antitrust and Regulation in Latin America | Concorrência e Regulamento na América Latina

Argentina – Desayuno antitrust sobre “Regulación y competencia”

Responder Cancelar respuesta

abril 2011
L	M	X	J	V	S	D
« Mar				May »
				1	2	3
4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17
18	19	20	21	22	23	24
25	26	27	28	29	30

Argentina – Desayuno antitrust sobre “Regulación y competencia”

Share this:

Me gusta:

Relacionado

Responder Cancelar respuesta